"'You are accepted. You are accepted, accepted by that which is greater than you, and the name of which you do not know. Do not ask for the name now; perhaps you will find it later. Do not try to do anything now; perhaps later you will do much. Do not seek for anything; do not perform anything; do not intend anything. Simply accept the fact that you are accepted!' If that happens to us, we experience grace. After such an experience we may not be better than before, and we may not believe more than before. But everything is transformed. In that moment, grace conquers sin, and reconciliation bridges the gulf of estrangement. And nothing is demanded of this experience, no religious or moral or intellectual presupposition, nothing but acceptance".
I have experienced grace. What I mean is the feeling above described by Paul Tillich. My experience with grace came last Easter. I was coming out of a spiritual funk and during church I started crying. It was during the time that I was ready to come out to my family and the emotion was overwhelming. I was sad, angry, and confused, but the feeling of grace overwhelmed me and I knew everything would be okay.
Amazing Grace. For a long time I never really understood that song and felt weird singing about it because I did not like to admit that I was a wretch. I never felt like a bad guy. Of course, I know I am not perfect. I guess I just felt that saying you were a wretch was a bit harsh. Plus, from where I stood I was morally superior to most of the people in my life.
Now my faith is radically different than it was before. It lacks the black and white that I had before. I fought through nihilism over the summer to reach the point I am at today. However, I am not sure where that is.
I grew up in a very conservative Christian home. The fall from this conservative Christianity was brutal. I just finished reading a great book by Peter Gomes: The Scandalous Gospel of Jesus. It was written for people new to the Christian faith and to people like me who have fallen out of conservative/evangelical Christianity. I can't think of anything in particular I took away from it, but nevertheless I recommend it. I have a hard time evaluating my previous Christian faith. I know it was quite self-centered and immature and dealt a lot with me failing in sin (being attracted to guys) and asking God to heal me. A lot of it was me being angry at God for withholding my dreams from me. I thought he was punishing me. However, my firm belief in there being "a plan (Providence)" allowed me to bear the suffering for years. My faith was also about works, and I tried to be a force for good in the world. However, I don't know how much of that was really tied to Christianity.
Today I am trying to live a moral life. I find this is a lot harder than I ever imagined. It requires, like Jesus said, "mercy not sacrifice". This does not mean that sacrifice is unnecessary, it just means mercy trumps it. I am now much more cognizant of my actions and the way my life impacts others. I have always had a passion for volunteering and a soft spot for immigrants. I'm working on increasing the time I give to others. Now that my life has become more devoted to morality I wonder what's the point? If there is no God, I don't believe in salvation through Jesus Christ, and I am highly skeptical about there being anything after this life, why should I care about this world? Shouldn't I just do everything I can to ensure my security, protection, and comfort?
No. I love creation. I want to build community. I want to share grace with the world. I want to usher in a messianic age (to borrow from Reform Judaism). Many people say that you can't be moral without believing in God. Maybe that's true. Maybe atheists don't know the source of their goodness.
I don't believe in cheap grace. It seems to me that many Christians (myself included) have a tendency to do immoral things and treat them as a "stumble", but that's all well and good because Jesus forgives. Now that Jesus has lost that role in my life, I find all of my decisions have a lot more gravity. Before I speak a slanderous word I mull it over. I realize that I will be living with the consequences. I can't just hide my conscience behind the cross.
I very much want to be a follower of Christ and I very much want to believe in God. However, I don't really believe in the theistic God that I held on to for so long. I also don't buy into the doctrine and dogma peddled by the church over the millennia. Lately I am especially irked by Augustine, Calvin, and rapture "theology". I feel so much hatred simmering when it comes to evangelical Christians and fundamentalists. I want to wake them up but would hate for their beliefs to crumble as mine have. It's not like I have anything better to offer them.
I like religion. I really, really do. I am a constant seeker and studier. I still pray, though prayer life has been severely damaged by my feeling of God's departure. Seeing all the hate and ignorance in the world I often wonder if it would just be better to jettison religion altogether. However, I am not the biggest fan of secularism.
This post didn't go anywhere and I am sorry to be so bitter and blunt.
I will leave you with one thing to mull over. During church today we talked about how easy it is to "love humanity, but no one in particular". So true.
Sunday, December 14, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Augustine and Calvin suck. Hardcore. And don't get me started on Paul, though he's better than Calvin.
(Whoops, he's in canon.)
I'm amused that you opened this to in-real-life friends and I'm still the first to comment on your most recent 5 posts! I'm at home for the holidays, and hope you have a good one, friend.
Haha, I just sent you a message. Freaky timing.
Yes, it is a shame my friends are slackers. Don't they know I secretly need comments for validation? Haha.
Paul and I have a hot and cold relationship. Augustine and Calvin do suck. I am now backing up the heretics of early Christianity like Origen! However, I still have more research to do. Hooray for "heresy".
You raise some interesting issues here, and so belatedly I'll joing the other commenter and give you my unsolicited thoughts on some things you wrote:
Plus, from where I stood I was morally superior to most of the people in my life.
Almost everyone thinks they're superior, morally and otherwise, to other people. There are various surveys which show that well over 50% of people think they're "above average" in all sorts of fields, such as driving. I'm sure you realize that such thinking is flawed. I'm not all that familiar with "Amazing Grace" or other Christian hymns but I always thought that the reference to "a wretch like me" meant a wretch before God, not a wretch before other human beings. Wretch is a very strong word, but in comparison to God I can see the poetic point of going to the extreme and calling "myself" (a man) a mere wretch. I think it's meant to glorify God, not debase humanity or any particular individual.
Seeing all the hate and ignorance in the world I often wonder if it would just be better to jettison religion altogether.
You make the mistake of identifying religion as the source of hate and ignorance.
Many religious people are hateful and ignorant. Many irreligious people are hateful and ignorant (just read the Daily Kos). People in general are ignorant unless they are civilized and educated (which arguably most aren't, even in the "western world") and although they have the ability for incredible altruism and compassion they can also very easily be stirred to hate and violence.
Human beings are animals. And most people, religious and irreligious, make verly little progress conquering their biology. I believe in free will and that all people have it, but I think people are often mistaken about the degree to which they're exercising it. Most people, including those with very high IQs and Ivy League educations, are not as rational as they probably think they are and interact with the world a lot through emotion and "instinct". (And, of course, I'm not making any claims to some sort of rational superiority: I'm fully aware of many seeming contradictions in views I hold and that often my emotion gets the better of my reason. Also I hope I'm not coming off as some misanthrope, I'm really not. I tend to like people).
People invoke whatever they need to justify their desire for war and cruelty and to justify their immorality. If not religion, it's nationalism, or socialism, or "the common good", or "self-preservation". In most cases religion is an excuse for war, not its cause.
Many people say that you can't be moral without believing in God.
That's nonsese. Religion has nothing to do with morality.
It seems to me that many Christians (myself included) have a tendency to do immoral things and treat them as a "stumble", but that's all well and good because Jesus forgives.
Are you sure most people are even aware of their stumbles? It seems to me lots of religious people (of all religions) seem completely ignorant of their "stumbles" and think they're "good" Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, whatever.
theistic God
Huh?
Lately I am especially irked by Augustine, Calvin [...] I am now backing up the heretics of early Christianity .
I don't know much about Augustine, I'll get to him eventually. I think Calvin is a very interesting character and more sympathetic than Luther, but of course I don't agree with his theology. As for heretics, one of the most interesting is Marcion. As a Jew, what I like about him is that he completely divorced Christianity from Judaism.
Ophir,
I very much love unsolicited comments! Allow me to respond:
Plus, from where I stood I was morally superior to most of the people in my life.
Almost everyone thinks they're superior, morally and otherwise, to other people. There are various surveys which show that well over 50% of people think they're "above average" in all sorts of fields, such as driving. I'm sure you realize that such thinking is flawed. I'm not all that familiar with "Amazing Grace" or other Christian hymns but I always thought that the reference to "a wretch like me" meant a wretch before God, not a wretch before other human beings. Wretch is a very strong word, but in comparison to God I can see the poetic point of going to the extreme and calling "myself" (a man) a mere wretch. I think it's meant to glorify God, not debase humanity or any particular individual.
I concur.
You make the mistake of identifying religion as the source of hate and ignorance.
I was referring to hate and ignorance generated by fundamentalism. I should have clarified. However, you do have a point. It is not simply religion's fault
Also I hope I'm not coming off as some misanthrope, I'm really not. I tend to like people).
I am supposed to have the monopoly on misanthropic tendencies around here. Haha.
Many people say that you can't be moral without believing in God.
That's nonsese. Religion has nothing to do with morality.
What I mean is that that all good/moral behavior could come from a source (like God). I don't mean believing in God is a requirement to living morally. What I mean is living morally is a result of God, regardless of whether you realize it or not.
Are you sure most people are even aware of their stumbles? It seems to me lots of religious people (of all religions) seem completely ignorant of their "stumbles" and think they're "good" Christians, Jews, Muslims, Hindus, atheists, whatever.
There's that misanthropic side showing again, haha.
theistic God
Huh?
As opposed to Diestic, pantheistic, etc. notion. It's like Yahweh in the Hebrew Bible, not YHWH. I think that is a correct statement. Please correct me if I am mistaken.
Judaism is extremely interesting to me and I would like to learn more about it. I am going to start taking a class at a local temple next year (hopefully). I can't wait!
Thanks for commenting. Feel free to e-mail anytime too! I love learning about other beliefs and discussing esoteric, metaphysical things with people who are at least marginally interested!
It's like Yahweh in the Hebrew Bible, not YHWH. I think that is a correct statement. Please correct me if I am mistaken.
Yahweh is just a Latin-alphabet rendering of the tetragrammaton. YHWH = YaHWeH (in Hebrew texts, if the name is vowellized, it's as something approximating YaHoWaH). They're the same. Perhaps you're thinking of the distinction some scholars make between Elohim and the tetragrammaton.
Thanks for commenting. Feel free to e-mail anytime too!
I don't think your e-mail is up anywhere on the blog. If you want to talk on IM or something you can get my screenname or e-mail from Jay.
Post a Comment